Aug 25 2006
Scientific breakthrough or monumental PR stunt?
Nearly 40,000 people, of which I am one, are waiting tosee whether Irish technology research company Steorn has effectively discovered the Loch Ness Monster or merely created another Piltdown Man, whether their product is the genuine article or a South Korean clone.
Briefly, Steorn claim to have developed a technology, based on permanent magnets, which creates ‘free energy’ – shattering the First Law of Thermodynamics. It doesn’t sound possible.
The cynics’ fire is being amply stoked by Steorn’s rather peculiar method of publicising and verifying their claims – a full-page advert in the Economist a week ago, kicking off a process of verification by an as yet unnamed panel of twelve scientists.
Behind the scenes (although openly acknowledged by Steorn) you have Citigate Dewe Rogerson, who presumably must take some of the credit for the growing media interest in Steorn’s invention. And a relatively successful PR campaign it’s proving so far, too. Consistent top-ten Technorati search rankings, broadsheet coverage and just enough intrigue and mystique to keep you guessing.
In 1988, shortly before the Turin Shroud was carbon-dated to medieval times, a sceptical but curious group of us collared my school chaplain and asked him to pronounce, with the aid of divine inspiration, on the shroud’s authenticity. His response? “I hope it’s real”.
I feel rather the same about Steorn’s source of free energy. I’ve followed the progress of alternative energy technology for some time and, later this year, hope to trade in my 125cc Aprilia for a Vectrix – partly to ‘do my bit’, but partly because the technology is so exciting.
So I would be delighted if Steorn’s claims are true. But the sensible side of my brain, dredging up the long-forgotten theories of A-level Physics, is already convinced that it’s all smoke and mirrors, a PR stunt, a demonstration of the hysteria that can be whipped up by viral marketing.
We’ll find out soon enough. In five years we’ll either all be zipping around in clean, Steorn-powerd vehicles, or we won’t. In the same way as Copernicus won out over Ptolemy, that the textbooks of my parents’ generation continued to list the atom as the smallest unit of matter a full decade after Hiroshima, or indeed that up until last week our own solar system had nine planets, the first law of thermodynamics might be bunk after all.
But if, in five years time, all that’s changed is that my ancient Volvo costs £100 to fill up instead of £75, hats off to Steorn and Citigate; you had me going.
Interested by the new Vectrix. Shame you have to travel to Florence to find a recharging station. Do you really think these electric vehicles will take off? Will it depend on the public or private sector, or both, getting behind the idea and providing drivers with enough recharging stations? Is there a good site out there helping a household work out its ecological footprint re: cars driven, energy consumption etc? My guess is your Aprilia is not all that much a villain in the first place. Sorry, more questions than answers, but perhaps not as unanswerable as other questions posed in the blog…
And good questions all of them. Charging stations can be found in London if you’re determined – lots of NCPs have them, for a start – although part of the attraction of the Vectrix for me is that my 36-mile round-trip commute should be well within its range. So provided I remember to plug it in at night I should be OK.
As for working out consumption, BP have set the ball rolling with http://www.targetneutral.com, although this focusses solely on car emissions rather than on domestic consumption.
You’re right, though, the emissions of my Aprilia – and even my Volvo – pale into insignificance when you look at, for example, the exponential growth in air travel.
Equally do my energy-saving lightbulbs really help save the world while we continue to light up Picadilly Circus 24 hours a day? Perhaps not, but the alternative – of doing nothing – is really no alternative at all.