Nov 30 2006
Public Affairs
(via Jessica Cutler)
Nov 30 2006
(via Jessica Cutler)
Nov 29 2006
It’s very nice, and quite shrewd, of Thresher to have dropped their 40% off voucher into the ether. It’s giving the viral marketing geeks loads to talk about, and more than a handful of blogs have picked it up.
But hang on a mo.
I live a few doors down from a Thresher – no, before you ask, that’s not why we bought the house. But I do patronise it fairly regularly. I enjoy the RAF stories of the gentleman who works there, and they sell a decent range of Ben & Jerry’s. Point being, ever since we moved in they’ve been doing three-for-two on all wine and champagne, an effective 33% off.
So, not to look a gift horse in the mouth or anything, but the 40% voucher is actually only worth 7.67%.
Still not a bad saving, but it doesn’t sound quite as viral as 40%, does it?
Pssst! If you want more vouchers … Selfridges GAP Borders
Nov 28 2006
The Star Wars Kid is where it’s at this week. Even the broadsheets are talking about him. The Times, for example, in its commentary yesterday on the Viral Factory’s research into viral videos, lists the top ten clips as downloaded by the rest of us.
All fine if you’re reading the print version. And, as you’d expect, the online version of the article carries links to each of the Top 10 clips mentioned.
Including Kylie Minogue’s Agent Provocateur ad, and something called One Night in Paris.
The Times figured this out pretty quick – by lunchtime yesterday the two links in question had disappeared. But for a couple of hours yesterday afternoon, one of the bastions of the British press was linking directly to some pretty saucy stuff.
The other eight links in the article remain – including the not altogether un-risqué Trojan Games … Nice to see someone at the our nation’s newspaper of record has a sense of humour.
Nov 27 2006
Having said which, if you’re going to repeat-blog, the Bell Pott party conference fiasco is one story well worth repeating as a salutory lesson for all of us.
Nov 18 2006
Well this week we had a bit of reuniting of our own going on here at Collective Conversations.
In Tuesday’s Paler shade of Bach I recounted the brief history of Southern Discomfort, which sadly ceased to be almost fifteen years ago when University got in the way of a music career which promised to be at best mediocre.
Yesterday my blog brought me one heck of a surprise: A comment from Guy Hedgecoe, my erstwhile partner in crime who disappeared off to Venezuela sometime in the mid 1990s.
Here at H&K we’re great believers in the power of connections. Blogs (and the ‘net in general) connect. QED.
And don’t take my word for it – look what happened to Dom earlier this year.
Guy, I’ll be in touch.
Nov 16 2006
Kudos to Tony and co for the launch this week of Number 10′s online petitions website. Thanks to some clever coding from the people over at mySociety, you can now petition the PM online.
The website’s only been up for two days but is already proving tremendously popular, with petitions requesting the PM to do everything from resign immediately to stand on his head and juggle ice cream. I wonder which they’d like him to do first?
Now, on the face of it I think the ePetition website is a great idea. Kind of like a citizens’ EDM website, although setting up an online petition does rather rob the petitioners of the pomp and circumstance of hand-delivering a petition to the black door with the wonky zero.
But I’ve a niggling concern. If you believe the various commentaries and observations, our friends over at Borkowski are in trouble (again), this time for apparently manipulating YouTube rankings.
Taking this one step further, how easy is it going to be for those pressure groups (or, dare I say it, lobbying firms) with either the time, manpower or resource, to artificially inflate a petition’s popularity?
I’m sure mySociety have thought of this, but on the face of it the ePetitions site does look an awful lot like an open invitation to astroturfing. Which can’t be good.
Nov 15 2006
Nov 14 2006
Southern Discomfort enjoyed more than moderate success, staging impromptu performances in classrooms, quadrangles and dining halls – in fact, now I think of it, did we invent flash-mobbing, a decade or so before its time? We played the odd more organised gig, too, and culminated, one balmy Wednesday afternoon in June of 1992, with a ninety-minute live session recorded by Tim Clark.
Our material ranged from popular blues covers – The Champs’ Tequila, bits of Rolling Stones and so on – to some straightforward, three-chord original material. We even jazzed up (some might say bastardised) La Marseillaise for “French Week”.
One of Guy’s and my early triumphs was a mournful, perhaps even mesmerising, two-Hohner rendition of A Whiter Shade of Pale. The crowds loved it. Which is perhaps why I’m more than a little saddened by this week’s court battle between Gary Brooker and Matthew Fisher over the latter’s desire to be included in the song’s credits – and its royalties.
Legends abound as to how AWSoP’s Bach-esque organ solo came into being. Some accounts tell of Fisher writing it, others of a chance turning upside down of some Well Tempered Clavier sheet music. Which wouldn’t surprise me. The TV news last night dismissed Procol Harum as a one-hit wonder, but those of us more familiar with the delights of Conquistador and She Wandered Through the Garden Fence will be well aware of the inclusion (at Gary’s suggestion) of more Bach: Specifically, bits of Prelude No 1 in C
major, not to mention a smattering of Tchaikovsky, in the middle of Fisher’s Repent Walpurgis.
Be that as it may, I think it’s a tremendous shame that, four decades on, Matt and Gary have resorted to such a public fight. Because if anyone genuinely knows the truth of how that organ solo came about, it’s those two.
This wrangling will never happen to me and Guy, of course.
Our album sleeve contained the crucial words: “All original material written and performed by Southern Discomfort“.
Nov 10 2006
Come this morning, of course, I’d completely forgotten that I’d installed it. Cue much hilarity as James starts complaining that “my computer’s crashed!” …
I love Fridays.
Nov 09 2006
And here we have: A blogger being interviewed about blogging, while watching herself being interviewed about blogging. I wonder if she’ll blog about that?
Which illustrates an interesting point: Are we blogthusiasts merely part of a bubble that’s becoming dangerously over-inflated?
Will history in the web3.0 era conclude that the pioneers of web2.0 were, in fact, little more than a ridiculous, self-obsessed self-parody?
Does anyone read blogs, apart from other bloggers?
No, I don’t think it’s that bad. But I do think an occasional reality check is probably a good thing.