<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fight!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stabe » The great political blog flame war</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe » The great political blog flame war</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>PingBack from

http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/17/the-great-political-blog-flame-war/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PingBack from</p>
<p><a href="http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/17/the-great-political-blog-flame-war/" rel="nofollow">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/01/17/the-great-political-blog-flame-war/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ireland</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Pants, yes. But surely of the big and comfortable variety...

I prefer Love Actually and its opening assertion that; &quot;When the planes hit the Twin Towers, none of the phone calls from people on board were messages of hate or revenge, they were all messages of love.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pants, yes. But surely of the big and comfortable variety&#8230;</p>
<p>I prefer Love Actually and its opening assertion that; &#8220;When the planes hit the Twin Towers, none of the phone calls from people on board were messages of hate or revenge, they were all messages of love.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, Owen you have to admit the fight scene is funny, even if the rest of the film is pants ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, Owen you have to admit the fight scene is funny, even if the rest of the film is pants &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggerheads</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggerheads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Guido&#039;s belated dance number comes to us a few days after the &#039;boycott&#039; brand was first applied, rinsed and repeated - and the first thing you&#039;ll notice is the cool, unshakeable exterior. Too bad about the ultra-paranoid level of moderation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guido&#8217;s belated dance number comes to us a few days after the &#8216;boycott&#8217; brand was first applied, rinsed and repeated &#8211; and the first thing you&#8217;ll notice is the cool, unshakeable exterior. Too bad about the ultra-paranoid level of moderation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Lystrup</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Lystrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>James you just lost your cool status for bringing up Bridget Jones.

Boo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James you just lost your cool status for bringing up Bridget Jones.</p>
<p>Boo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Beltran</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Beltran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Very interesting in the context of what discussion there has been about the need to police the content of &#039;blogs such as Guido&#039;s.

I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s the fascist in me speaking, but I find his (Tim&#039;s) fears about &#039;blog police&#039; an intriguing suggestion - one to perhaps look at in a more positive way.

I have a vison of an internet A-Team exposing wrongs around the world by a carrying out the kind of &#039;deep audit&#039; that this Tim bloke has clearly done of Guido&#039;s site. Perhaps such an audit could be marketed as a sensible prerequisite for those seeking to advertise on similar &#039;blogs, thus encouraging probity and creating a web-based job for someone who might otherwise be designing microsites for multinationals.

Still going to read Guido, though, but then I do flip through the Star on a semi-regular basis to see what it is that&#039;s pissed off the guy driving the bus today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting in the context of what discussion there has been about the need to police the content of &#8216;blogs such as Guido&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s the fascist in me speaking, but I find his (Tim&#8217;s) fears about &#8216;blog police&#8217; an intriguing suggestion &#8211; one to perhaps look at in a more positive way.</p>
<p>I have a vison of an internet A-Team exposing wrongs around the world by a carrying out the kind of &#8216;deep audit&#8217; that this Tim bloke has clearly done of Guido&#8217;s site. Perhaps such an audit could be marketed as a sensible prerequisite for those seeking to advertise on similar &#8216;blogs, thus encouraging probity and creating a web-based job for someone who might otherwise be designing microsites for multinationals.</p>
<p>Still going to read Guido, though, but then I do flip through the Star on a semi-regular basis to see what it is that&#8217;s pissed off the guy driving the bus today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ireland</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Gah! Sorry, James.

Multiple Thread Syndrome.

I&#039;ll get my coat, shall I?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah! Sorry, James.</p>
<p>Multiple Thread Syndrome.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll get my coat, shall I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s John?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s John?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ireland</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>PS - How rude of me...

Hi John. Thanks for your input; you&#039;ve clearly identified the major credibility/stability issues here... and you haven&#039;t said anything mean about my mother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; How rude of me&#8230;</p>
<p>Hi John. Thanks for your input; you&#8217;ve clearly identified the major credibility/stability issues here&#8230; and you haven&#8217;t said anything mean about my mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ireland</title>
		<link>http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbarbour.org/blog/2007/01/16/fight/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>1. Guido, you&#039;re being less-than-honest in your framing here.

2. You know where I am, and you know that I&#039;m not about to engage you fully on this matter on any other site but yours (where you are unlikely to set a &#039;right of reply&#039; precedent) and mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Guido, you&#8217;re being less-than-honest in your framing here.</p>
<p>2. You know where I am, and you know that I&#8217;m not about to engage you fully on this matter on any other site but yours (where you are unlikely to set a &#8216;right of reply&#8217; precedent) and mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
